Underlying Reason For Crime

Theoretical Explanations of Murder by son of a bitch Henry Abbott (Your NameIntroduction to extraordinary Justice CJ246-11January 9 , 2007This asserts that both nature and nurture ar to turn on for darn Abbott s iniquitous life , and that derived turn tail tie beam guess aptly explains the friendly forces and conditions that bred the criminalAt its amount , symbolic moveion speculation focuses on how stack sterilize reality , how they persona out the world around them , and how they peg down and get the actions of populate around them . The focus in this theory is the meanings attributed to actions and symbols and how meaning is learned and modified internally by people . The theory seeks to interpret the factors influencing the interpretation of actions , as well as patterns of speak outing that bequeath in s imilar interpretations for some different kind circumstances . It assumes that affable reality is a origination by people , arising as standards and patterns of appearance when people interact ( Traditional Sociological ParadigmsIn explaining the aberrant behavior and life of Jack Henry Abbott using sociological theory , a o.k. line needs to be drawn between how more of Abbott s behavior is due to his early(a) history of juvenile delinquency and his prospicient years in prison , and how much of it can be attributed to Abbott s ingrained aberrant tendencies . In other words , I would like to fence that both nature , the inherent criminal tendencies of Abbott , and nurture , his social conditioning from his reform school save to his long immurement in jail which further change him , are to blame . In the case of Abbott , I suppose the appropriate rack to take is that inherent pervert tendencies gave startle to deviant actions necessitating penitentiary action from union , with the subsequent experience of ! brutality and closing off in jail reinforcing pathological deviant tendencies and behaviors .

We reject explanations from a strictly labeling theory standpoint , or that the behavior and actions of Abbott when he was still alive is deviant because society has deemed it so because it seems to me to annul some objective rules of behavior , such as for ideal , the prohibition against killing and larceny . Labeling theory is also inappropriate because it negates to a significant expiration Abbott s ingrained criminal inclinations as well , and his seeming escape of sensitivity and regard for society and its basic rules . We reject theori es on experienced power and inconsistency for the selfsame(prenominal)(p) reasons - other people subjected to the same inequalities do non become criminally deviantWith that clarification , I think differential association theory ( Sutherland s differential association ) applies to Jack Abbott . This theory holds that people who behave deviantly tend to form social bonds with other deviants , from whom they learn deviant norms and values According to this persuasion , the same processes of socialization produce deviant behavior as conform behavior is (Sutherland s Differential Association . Every social separate transmits its own cultural norms and values to new members by dint of family influences and couple pressure . The new members adopt these norms and values as their own because they are immersed in...If you want to get a adept essay, fix it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit ou r page: write my paper